The governor’s discretion is not unfettered, the top court warned, but it cannot be reduced to a purely “perfunctory” role.
Five-judge Bench says imposing judicial deadlines or deeming assent amounts to judiciary encroaching on executive powers ...
In a judgment that could reignite the debate surrounding federalism and Governor's role in State affairs, the Supreme Court ...
Supreme Court rules judiciary cannot impose timelines on President and Governor for State Bills, affirming separation of ...
In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court held that the directions in its April 8 judgment that set timelines for Governors ...
The Bench led by the Chief Justice B R Gavai, and comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and Atul S ...
The Presidential reference was made in May, soon after the judgment delivered by a two-judge bench in the Tamil Nadu Governor ...
Stalin asserted that the state would not back down from its demand for mandatory timelines for Governors to act on Bills ...
In a judgment that could reignite the debate surrounding federalism and Governor's role in State affairs, the Supreme Court ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback