The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a case challenging the president's birthright citizenship order on April 1.

Brothers in Law is a recurring series by brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar, with special emphasis on measuring what the Supreme Court says against what the Constitution itself says. For more content from ...

Critics and supporters of President Donald Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship often focus on the order’s barring of automatic citizenship to children born to individuals unlawfully ...

Trump imposed the order last year as a means to deter pregnant tourists from having their babies in the United States and illegal migrants to stop using the method as a way to remain in the country.

Over the course of its first year in office, the second Trump administration has neutralized the enforcement of key civil ...

Donald Trump predicted the Supreme Court will rule against his effort to curb birthright citizenship, days after the justices ...

Judge Aileen Cannon just barred the Department of Justice from releasing the second volume of former special counsel Jack ...

As the Senate considers President Donald Trump's stringent anti-voter fraud measure, legal experts say Kansas's offers a ...

For over 150 years, birthright citizenship, which grants citizenship to children born in the U.S. regardless of their parents’ immigration status—has shaped generations of students who attend public ...

For the past 14 months, Americans of all political persuasions have witnessed how Trump’s ICE-related actions have involved aggressive detention and tdemonization of immigrants and minorities.

The justices on April 1 will hear oral arguments in a landmark case in which the high court will decide whether it is constitutional for the president to block the children of immigrants without legal ...

Backing has come from such legal heavyweights as the America First Legal Foundation and conservative boutique law firms ...